SAVDHAN INDIA AND DASTAK

(All that is necessary for evil to succeed is, for good men to do nothing—Edmund Burke.)

(By Dr V S Karnik)(Dec 2014)

1. After watching FIFA football matches for a month at night regularly, once the matches were over, there was nothing much for me to watch on TV. Suddenly, I came across two TV serials, based on real crime stories in India. The names of these serials are “Sawadhan India” and “Dastak. “, showing real crime cases of India. The meaning of “Sawadhan India” is to alert people, as somewhere crime is taking place. “Dastak” means that, a criminal, before actually committing a crime, gives some indications about the impending crime, by his pattern of behaviour. Dastak is equivalent to indications of what is going to happen. These real stories and the headings kept me thinking and worrying, which is related to bigger issues for India.
2. For the past one year’s happenings, in India, were startling. First, the riot like situation at the Azad maidan in Mumbai, where lakhs of Muslims gather to show their support to Muslims of Assam. The photographs published, showed the autocracies committed against Muslims from Assam. This caused, riot like situation.(However, the fact came out that the photographs were taken in Burma.) During the demonstration, the demonstrators, destroyed national monument, connected with war, stripped a woman police officer, attacked police station and personnel. The mob had weapons like AK 47. The state government failed to take any action against the defaulters.(or did NOT take action intentially) The media did not give adequate coverage and quickly the matter was forgotten. Secondly, a prominent Muslim MP from Hyderabad, publically, in his public meeting at Hyderabad, said that if police are withdrawn for 15 minutes we (the Muslim) will wipe out Hindus. Some more utterances in public by prominent Muslim leaders are attached as APPENDIX A. (MUST READ. These are factual). Thirdly, Four educated Muslim youth went to Iraq and 90 from Kerala and AP went to Syria to fight for ISIS(Islamic State of Iraq and Syria).ISIS has set up Caliphate, .Fourthly, Maulana Salman Nakvis,(An Indian) has written an open letter to Saudi Arabia, asking to receive an army of five lakh Indian Sunni youth, to fight Shiites in Iraq. Fifthly, riots between Muslim and Sikh, about the ownership of land at Saharanpur on religious ground. Sixthly, prominence given in all print and electronic media, regarding absence of Iftar parties, by NDA ministers and PM, amounting to as if, great sin has been committed. Seventhly, flags of ISIS started appearing in Kashmir valley.

Other  Dastaks.

3. First, Sachhar committee findings were absolutely pro Muslims. Second, Even PM Dr MM Singh had said, while he was the PM, that the first right to Indian recourses is of minorities (especially Muslim,) as they are major of the minorities. Third, anti riot bill proposed by UPA and Mrs S Gandhi was anti Hindus. It is an eye opening, how a minority appeasing government can go to any extent to destroy this nation and Hindus. Fourthly, watching and listening national debates on major TV news channels. It all ends up in supporting minorities and blaming majority. Fifthly, rise of Wahabi Islam in India (especially in Kerala, AP, MP, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra). A decade ago, Wahabies were 10 % of Muslim population of Muslims of India, now it is 28%. This assessment is from IB. Wahabies preaches hardest form of Islam. Sixthly, Wahabi’s (Saudi’s) are building madaras all over India for making Muslims into militant Islam. Seventhly, ongoing invasion by Bangladeshis, from Bangladesh..

Mahatma Gandhi and Muslims.

4. At this stage it is relevant to point out roles played by the prominent national leaders, in the past. Mahatma Gandhi’s policies towards the Muslims in India were of appeasement, in an effort to keep them within united India. He believed that love begets love and that concessions to Muslims would be reciprocated. His appeasement policies led nowhere and failed miserably. In spite the country was divided on religion basis, Gandhi begged Muslim residing in parts of India not to go to Pakistan and remain in India, without realising the consequences. He even asked Hindus to surrender before Muslims. Gandhi favoured Jawaharlal Nehru and Nehru family, for obvious reasons. (Please see the documentary evidence available in public domain).There were more able people than Nehru to lead the nation. Jawaharlal Nehru’s, policies, towards the Muslims, in India, were, of appeasement. The story about marriage of Indira Gandhi to Firoz Khan and subsequent, change of name to Firoz Gandhi is well known. Mahatma Gandhi helped them to change their name to Gandhi. (This was ethically wrong). The people of India (uneducated, and educated) think, that the members of the present Gandhi family, are decedents of Mahatma Gandhi. Rajiv Gandhi converted to Christianity and of course Sonia Gandhi is Christian. Thus we were ruled by Muslims and Christian dynasties, after independence, up till now.
5. Gandhi made Hindus impotent by his teaching. We are under wrong impression that Gandhi gave us freedom and he “drove away” British. In this connection, it is worth to read following:

“Apart from revisionist historians, it was none other than Lord Clement Atlee himself, the British Prime Minister responsible for conceding independence to India, who gave a shattering blow to the myth sought to be perpetuated by court historians, that Gandhi and his movement had led the country to freedom. Chief Justice P.B. Chakrabarty of Calcutta High Court, who had also served as the acting Governor of West Bengal in India, disclosed the following in a letter addressed to the publisher of Dr. R.C. Majumdar’s book –A History of Bengal. The Chief Justice wrote: ‘ My direct question to him (Atlee) was that since Gandhi’s “Quit India” movement had tapered off quite some time ago and in 1947 no such new compelling situation had arisen that would necessitate a hasty British departure, why did they have to leave? In his reply, Atlee cited several reasons, the principal among them being the erosion of loyalty to the British Crown, of the armed forces. Towards the end of our discussion I asked Atlee, “What was the extent of Gandhi’s influence, upon the British decision, to quit India?” Hearing this question, Atlee’s lips became twisted in a sarcastic smile as he slowly chewed out the word, “minimal”.

6. Also, we had leaders who were, as if, pledged to sap all manliness from their own people. However, this is not a mere accident of history. This leadership came only as a bitter climax of the tribe of so many of our ancestors who, during the past twelve hundred years sold their national honour and freedom to foreigners. In their chase of achieving new unity and new nationality, our leaders raised the slogan of ‘Hindu-Muslim unity’. The first thing they preached was that our nationality could not be called Hindu, that even our land could not be called by its traditional name Hindustan, as that would have offended the Muslims. The name “India” given by the British was accepted. Taking that name, the ‘new nation’ was called the ‘Indian Nation’. And the Hindu was asked to rename himself as ‘Indian’.

Other Important factors.

7. Madarsa. Are we aware what is being taught in Muslim Madaras and who is funding them with huge amount? Has any secularist visited madarasa and observed what is being taught?, In most of the madaras, everything against Hindus is taught, and all Muslim invaders are glorified. It is a training ground for pure fundamentalist Muslims. (It will be very interesting to know that, Pakistan, right from its inception, is teaching, to the students, in their schools, hate about Indian and Hindus.)

 

7. Muslims do not regard themselves as conquerors of the lands of the infidels, but their liberators. That is based on the premise that the lands, people and property of all the world belong to Allah and his followers and that they are merely taking possession of what is rightfully theirs. The Islam does not recognize national border. Their loyalty is towards Islam religion, Koran and Umma. Therefore, Muslim youth are ready to go to Iraq and many youth from many countries are already fighting war for Sunnis in Iraq. Muslims readily betray their motherland for the sake of their umma. Muslims apparently do not have a concept of nationalism but only of the Umma. Umma in essence is supposedly the collective worldwide Muslim community. They do not have any allegiance to a motherland or fatherland. Muslims always claim to be willing to do anything for Islam, but apparently not much for either humanity or the nation where they may live. Muslim religion does not recognize any international border. Their first loyalty is to the religion. Islam sees India as an “unfinished business” and it is has been often declared as part of Islamic land. It has the status of a Muslim land, occupied by kefirs and must be reclaimed by Islam. Oil-rich Muslim countries, are spending millions trying to convert and subvert India to Islam.
8. Hindus who are complacent, need to understand the consequences. If the current situation continues, Christen missionaries, and Muslims, in a democracy with a highly corrupt political system, culturally deprived intelligentsia, with billions of dollars and little scruples, have the potential to convert a majority of India’s population, in just a few years. This, along with vote bank politics, can result in complete marginalization of Hindus and the division of India.
9. . We are giving special privileges to minority but none to majority. We ban anything, which offends Muslims, but do not ban anything, which offends Hindus. Indian Muslims get offended on minor issues. Hindus make fun of our culture and Gods and glorify other religions. There is too much tolerance with Hindus. We are worried about not offending Muslims and thereby start getting controlled by them (examples –reservation, demands, changing constitution) Hindus do not mind shifting their Idols from the temples or demolishing part of temple walls if the town plan requires widening the roads. However, same if tried in case of mosques, or their land, then there is huge uproar from the Muslim community,  We are more mindful of offending sentiments of Muslims than we are of Hindu, Sikh or Christens. Hindus are second-class citizens. No one sympathized with Kar sevaks burnt at Godhra. Ours is still a “weak soft state”. We are not proud of Hindu religion and issues connected with it.  Every country in the world, including USA, is proud of its own religion. We are too apologetic submissive about our Hinduism.  The pseudo –secularist, kick any one, supporting Hindu religion They also, protect other religions, apart from Hindu, giving kick to Hindu religion or make fun of  Hindu religion.   This attitude is helping Muslim activities to their benefit and cause. Unfortunately majority of Hindus have neither read nor understood Muslim religion. Therefore, they are misinformed about true contents of that religion.
10. The problems faced by India are–1. Mass Conversions. 2. Destruction of true Hindu, Institutions and culture3. Vote Bank Politics4. Hindu Apathy and Ignorance.

On Indian Muslims and Christians

11. The question before us now is what is the attitude of those people who have been converted to Islam or Christianity? They are born in this land, no doubt. But are they true to their salt? Are they grateful to this land which has brought them up? Do they feel that they are the children of this land and its tradition, and that to serve it is their great good fortune? Do they feel it a duty to serve her? No! Together with the change in their faith, gone is the spirit of love and devotion for the nation. Nor does it end there. They have also developed a feeling of identification with the enemies of this land. They call themselves ‘Sheikhs’ and ‘Syeds’. Sheikhs and Syeds are certain clans in Arabia. How then did these people come to feel that they are their descendants? That is because they have cut off their ancestral national culture of this land and mentally merged themselves with the aggressors. They still think that they have come here only to conquer and establish their kingdoms. So, we see that it is not merely a case of change of faith, but a change even in national identity. Swami Vivekananda had rightly said, “For every convert, that is lost to Hinduism, it is not just one lost, but one more enemy to Hinduism. Conversion is Perversion”.

 

Conversion Subverts Loyalty

12. Conversion of Hindus into other religions is nothing but making them succumb to divided loyalty in place of having undivided and absolute loyalty to the nation. It is dangerous to the security of the nation and the country. It is therefore necessary to put a stop to it. Conversion of an individual does not take place after a serious and comparative study of philosophies by him. It is by exploitation of poverty, illiteracy and ignorance, offering of inducements and by deceptive tactics that people are converted. There is no question of a true change of heart involved in this. It is but right that this unjust activity is prohibited. It is a duty; we have to discharge towards protecting our brethren in ignorance and poverty.

Swami Dayanand Saraswati — His thoughts and a Story.

13. Swami Dayanand Saraswati on 17 Jul 1999, in his key note address at Chennai, said on subject “Conversion is violence.” “Worst aggression is aggression on culture and religion. One cannot separate culture from religion. Destruction of culture is destruction of religion.”
14. (Story as told by Swami.) “I stay at Rishikesh. Two people one Padre and one Malawi comes to me. They try to argue with me about supremacy of their religion. They pick up quarrel with me, and then they began to beat me. There is a policeman standing there. They go on beating me black and blue. I implore to the policeman “please stop them. I am committed to ahimsa. I do not want to fight them back. You please do something.” He says, “This is a matter between religious people. I am secular. I am not supposed to interfere.” I appeal to him number of times. He does not respond to me. Then I think that, I have to protect myself. My Shastra will forgive me. Even though I am given to Ahimsa, still I can protect myself. I began to defend myself. The best form of defence is offence. But then a policeman stops me and says, “They are minorities .They have to be protected and you should not fight against them.” I say,”Hey policeman, you are the government and you are supposed to protect me. You cannot be like this.” This is the situation that is prevailing in India .The role of some media, intellectuals, and so called pseudo-secularists, are akin to our Policeman, mentioned above.
15. Vir Sanghvi, during Feb 2006, wrote in the newspaper, Hindustan Times” The time has come now, for us to stop waiting for moderate Muslim to speak up. Liberal Hindus must end the double standard of the secular mind set and speak out as loudly against Muslim fundamentalists, they do against Hindu extremism. If we do not do that, we discredit the whole concept of secularism.”
16. Hindus really do not seems to understand and make effort to know, and realise, what the invaders (Muslims and christens) really did to them, which may be repeated again.

The Possible Solutions.

17. Change from the concept of “Vasudev Kutubhav” and “Guest is God.”
18. Lower middle class and poor class Hindus are most religious. One can notice the large number people attending Kumbha mela, participants of Kavadiya and large attendance at religious places. Same people are most vulnerable to conversion.  These must be educated and their economical condition must be rapidly improved. We, specially educated ones, must learn the tenants of Islam and study Quran, then only we can realise their concept to unit world by one religion, that is by Islam, by announcing Jihad. Educated people, in this context, must educate, poor Hindus about this.
19. Also there is need to be aware the correct events of Indian history, its interpretation and how Hindus were treated as slaves by the invaders and conquerors. Indian history is basically written by Muslims and Christen (Conquerors), communist and so called secularist.
20. All laws must be favourable to the majority Hindus. Therefore we must have Common civil code and abrogation of article 370( This can happen only, when pro Hindu political party gets absolute majority majority, in both houses, to amend the constitution).
21. Vande Mataram song , Gita, Yog etc, in school (Muslim may not attend. Neglect them) must be taught and recited. (Muslim may not attend. Neglect them)
22. Demography change must be avoided by checking Muslim population coming from Pakistan and BD.
23. We have to teach our children about our forefathers, scriptures, Vedas etc. All Muslim countries teach Koran, and Christens, Bible. Why not, we teach our religious scriptures to children. USA is a secular country but also a Christian majority country.
    We are failing to understand that, Power respects power, meek remains weak and is kicked around.
24. India is a secular country because Hindus are in majority.
25. Learn from Israelite. Hindu policy should be “tooth for tooth and eye for eye as far as Pakistan and Bangladesh are concerned. Basically, all Indian Muslims’ forefathers were Hindus, but, under certain circumstances were converted to Islam. We should aim to educate Indian Muslim on certain issues, if they want to stay in harmony with Hindus .Otherwise they should be ready to face Hindu backlash. We should gear up to save our Bharatmata, Hindu religion and culture.
26. It’s time we discard Mahatma MK Gandhi, Nehru and present Gandhi family. They have done enough damage to India and Hindus. We should bury some of the concepts and teaching of Mahatma Gandhi. It may have worked earlier (??), but will not work in the present world environment. Other nations have discarded their “valuable and glorified “leaders from history, for the point of view of their national interest.
27. Some of the western countries, Japan, Russia and China are fully aware about spread of Islam and its implications and are taking corrective measures. There is no need to discuss these here, which are available on internet. However , the thought of French government and one e mail from German are worth reading which are given at APPENDIX B and C(attached)

 

Are Hindus hearing/listening?

27. These “Dastaks”and sound of “Savdhan India” are very loud and clear. Are Hindus listening? Or they are blissfully ignoring these. Or even after listening and understanding, they are ignoring,these. Trinidad’s Former Prime Minister in interview said (Quote)”, An Indian (Hindu) is culturally more concerned about himself and his family, educating his children, making his life better, as opposed to group advancement. He is highly individualistic. That is what reduces his political power”(Unquote).How correct is the Trinidad’s Former Prime Minister. If Hindus do not change this attitude, the Hindus will be very soon minority in India.

 

28. SAVADHAN INDIA, TAKE NOTE OF DASTAK. TIME BOMB IS TICKING

 

JAI HO.

Regards.

——- Dr VS Karnik

(Written during Dec 2014)

Bibliography:

1. Various e mails received and exchanged.
2. Sources as quoted in the articles.