Redrawing borders by military might is well nigh impossible in today’s world.
Doing so by diplomatic means is a ‘give and take’ business and termed as settling boundary disputes and is a possibility.
In case of erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir, both India and Pakistan claim the territory internationally , but also understand that any change in status quo of boundaries is well next to impossible and the same belief is held by UN, given strategic importance of Jammu and Kashmir to both India, Pakistan and China (China occupies Aksai Chin area , besides some territory ceded by Pakistan to it) see the image below
cok 1 is Shaksgam valley ceded to China by Pakistan.
The Aksai chin area on map is represented as COK2 , is of strategic importance to China as it connects the Xinxiang province to the north with West Tibet in the south through China National Highway 219 (G219). see map below
In so much, as Jammu and Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan is concerned neither side is ready to make any concession on territory either by diplomatic or military means.
As far as China is concerned, lets see the dispute in east. It lies over Arunachal Pradesh which became an Indian state 20 Feb 1987 . See the map below
The red portions depicts the state of Arunachal which China refuses to recognise and considers as disputed. The history of that is quite long but suffice to say that China is prepared to recognise it in exchange of India giving its claims over Aksai Chin, which China considers important for its control over West Tibet. In 1960, Zhou Enlai unofficially suggested that India drop its claims to Aksai Chin in return for a Chinese withdrawal of claims over NEFA (Arunachal Pradesh).
So basically dispute between China and India can be resolved by letting them have Aksai Chin officially (which anyway China has) in return for letting India have Arunachal (which anyway India has).
As for India and Pakistan, such give and take is impossible as both consider the territory of J& K, non -negotiable real estate due to its strategic and political implications.
Military options doesnot have significant take aways compared to the costs involved. South Asia is seen as nuclear flashpoint and rightly so as all three nations involved are nuclear enabled state, and forcible redrawal of boundaries are bound to have unacceptable repercussions in the region.
On hypthetical basis, it may happen if some how pakistan fragments and India is forced to send forces to reclaim the territory to safeguard its interests in the follow up events to such fragmentation.
With China, hypothetically a Thirld world war may cause it to be so much at the receiving end (like happened to Germany after second world war), that it ceases to claim these territories and India if untouched by the war, is easily able to integrate them within its fold.
Thanks for A2A Mr Rajagopal
Historically speaking, the moderates always ruled the INC and the extremists were written off, India has been a country that won’t attack unless attacked, and rightly so.
Talking about the POK, this encroachment into the Indian territory happened right after the partition, wherein the ruler of J&K was convinced to be a part of India but Pakistan was far from letting go. The loss of property and life was so extreme following the partition that the UN intervention got India’s hands tied. Hence the ceasefire agreement was settled upon.
As far as China occupied ladakh is concerned, there have been different theories in both of the countries regarding the “LINE OF ACTUAL CONTROL” and the fundamentals are still being worked upon.
Now in terms of action that can be taken, India can take back POK in a jiffy considering the humongous strength of the army. But as far as the Chinese are concerned they have been known to be notorious, be it the Tibet issue or be it ladakh, and countering them is gonna be a real uphill task.
- Preserve status quo, but maintain claims: Talk all you want for political gains or international diplomacy —but nobody is getting anything. Whatever border exists now will remain so in the future. There will be no wars, only claims. The three countries can claim all they want —Pakistan can claim the entirety of Kashmir, or even parts of Punjab or fuck it, Tamil Nadu, and India can claim Islamabad! But again, really, nobody is getting anything.
What this means: Pakistan gets to keep Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan; China gets to keep Aksai Chin; India gets to keep the remaining of Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh. - Formally withdraw claims, preserve status quo: The three kids can all grow up and formally withdraw all claims on each other’s territory and preserve status quo.
- Diplomacy: Get other countries to withdraw claims on your territory —but refuse to do the same yourselves. Ha! Not happening, not happening at all. Or, exchange territories. China gets to keep the parts of Arunachal Pradesh it wants, and India gets to keep Aksai Chin —this is not preferred, of course, but just saying that it is one possibility.
Publicly, India has been holding to its stated position that there can’t be any territorial concessions. But behind the closed doors of the negotiating room, India has told China that it “may not be averse to status quo position”.