Intelligence Bureau should probe if women in menstrual age entering Sabrimala Temple on 02.01.2019 had real religious feelings or did so to deliberately hurt sentiments of Hindus
Proverb Law-is-Blind proves totally fit on unpractical Supreme Court verdict allowing women of menstrual age in Sabrimala Temple in Kerala, causing unnecessary problem of law and order in approach-way to the temple and hurting practical religious sentiments of majority community including women in menstrual age. However it is for sure that the verdict never allowed its symbolic implementation by non-religious ladies not for faith, but to deliberately hurt religious sentiments on an aspect where tradition was set on practical aspects but not at all as gender-discrimination.
Intelligence Bureau should probe if the two ladies making a fraud entry in the temple in conspiracy with anti-religion state-government on 02.01.2019 were of religious mind having true respect for Lord Ayyappan who was a brahmchari and whose deity required keeping away from women of menstrual age. No woman of menstrual age having true faith in Lord Ayyappan could even think of entering Sabrimala Temple. In case two ladies are found to be anti-religion, criminal cases should be filed against them for misusing Supreme Court verdict just to hurt religious sentiments of majority community.
Unfortunately cumbersome and super-costly justice-delivery-system does not practically allow filing case against such misuse of Supreme Court verdict. Therefore central government and Supreme Court should feel themselves duty-bound to take sue-motto cognizance of misuse of court-verdict to deliberately hurt practical religious sentiments of Hindus world-wide. Now when President of main opposition-party Congress is also visiting temple after temple, he should co-ordinate with Prime Minister for a joint-action plan to save religious sentiments of Hindus to ensure that women in menstrual age may not enter Sabrimala Temple.
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL